- Severity
- HIGH
- Status
- IN PROGRESS
- Owner
- Financial Crimes Compliance
- Root cause
- Monitoring & logging
- Test failure
- Design assessment (CDA)
- Opened
- 2025-12-10
- Due
- 2026-07-31
- Closed
- —
203 days old as of 2026-07-01
Two products launched without corresponding monitoring scenarios.
PARTIAL
tested 2025-11-30
This issue records a CDA failure, shown first.
Control Design Assessment (CDA)
Procedures evaluating whether the control is designed adequately.
- 1.Obtain and read the scenario coverage review procedure; confirm it requires mapping monitoring scenarios to current products and typologies at least annually.
- 2.Confirm the process requires new products to be assessed for scenario coverage before or shortly after launch.
Control Operating Effectiveness (COE)
Procedures evaluating whether the control operated over the testing period.
- 1.Confirm the most recent annual coverage review was completed and covers all current products.
- 2.Select products launched in the period and confirm each was assessed for monitoring scenario coverage.
- 3.Confirm gaps identified in the review were remediated or risk-accepted with documented approval.
Related issues
Same root cause or a shared entity
Score contribution
Issue-pressure points as of 2026-07-01, before the factor is capped at 0–100.
- AML Transaction Monitoring25 of 31.25 pts
80% of this entity’s issue pressure
Annual priority score: 47 · issue pressure carries 20% weight in the active model — one factor among several behind that score.
- HIGH severity: 25
Linked entities
- AML Transaction Monitoring
PROCESS · CRITICAL